Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Starritt
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1967No. Civ. 23632PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Plaintiff, Everett J. Matthews (hereafter Matthews), appeals from an adverse judgment in his action for declaratory relief against W. B. and Betty Starritt (hereafter Starritt), holding that he was not entitled to a real estate broker’s commission under either the exclusive listing agreement or the deposit receipt. He contends that the trial court erred in construing the written agreements of the parties. We have concluded that there is no merit in this contention.
The record reveals the following: Matthews, a licensed real estate broker with 18 years of experience, was representing a buyer,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Edwards v. BillowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Warshauer v. Bauer Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rubin v. FuchsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- VONS COS., INC. v. US Fire Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Century 21 Butler Realty, Inc. v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Lodging Property Brokers v. Chang CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2013