Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Waldron

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 27, 1981No. 39,505; NCM 78 1382Published

1DissentCook, Judge

The Court of Military Review and Judge Fletcher apparently consider significant in*39dividual military counsel’s effort to have the case submitted to the court-martial members without instruction on offenses lesser than that charged. I think it appropriate, therefore, to point out, preliminarily, that defense counsel did not intend to relieve the trial judge of responsibility to instruct on those lesser offenses which counsel said “must be instructed on as a matter of law.” Counsel’s remarks indicate that, despite his insistence on limited instructions, he wanted to be certain that if the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. GrundenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. WaldronUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. PatrickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. WaldronU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API