Legal Opinion
Forrest Drive Associates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided September 17, 1999No. 1:98CV00519PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OSTEEN, District Judge.
On August 13, 1999, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Thereafter, the Court received plaintiffs objections to the Recommendation and defendant’s response to the objections.
The Court has appropriately reviewed the parties’ submissions de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s rulings which are affirmed and adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Robert Pachaly, Jr. v. City of Lynchburg R.D. Viar William G. Petty, and Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Walton v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Burris Chemical, Incorporated v. Usx Corporation, Burris Chemical, Incorporated v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crosby v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Oakwood Village LLC v. Albertsons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Downtown Barre Development v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Alchemy Communications Corp. v. Preston Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Crosby v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.