Legal Opinion
Downtown Barre Development v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 28, 2004No. 03-209PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. The principal issue in this case is whether the parties’ commercial lease allows the current shopping plaza tenant to divide the subject premises and create two smaller retail establishments out of the space where the former tenant had operated a supermarket. The owner of the shopping plaza, plaintiff Downtown Barre Development (DBD), filed suit in an attempt to stop intervenor Maxi Drug, Inc. from purchasing the former tenant’s rights under the lease and commencing renovation work on its plan to divide the premises, set up a Brooks Pharmacy in part of the space where the former…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Morrisseau v. FayetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Lexington InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- John A. Russell Corp. v. BohligSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Gregg Beldock v. VWSD, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- Madowitz v. Woods at Killington Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Knelman v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
- Rotman v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- Field v. CostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.