Legal Opinion

Ridley v. Guaranty National Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1997No. 96-697PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

The plaintiff, Keith Ridley, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against the defendant, Guaranty National Insurance Company, in the District Court for the First Judicial District in Lewis and Clark County. Ridley sought a District Court judgment that § 33-18-201, MCA, of the Montana Unfair Trade Practices Act requires a tort-feasor’s insurer to pay the actual medical expenses of a tort victim as they are incurred when liability is reasonably clear. The District Court concluded that an insured does not have an obligation in all cases to pay an injured third party’s medical expenses in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Boreen v. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Orozco v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Brandon Moe v. Geico Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. Northfield Insurance v. Montana Ass'n of CountiesMontana Supreme Court · 2000

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API