Legal Opinion

Pallister v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Montana, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2012No. DA 11-0431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶ 1 This case arises out of claims asserted by multiple persons against Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) and Montana Comprehensive Health Association (MCHA). Claimants assert that while they were fully insured by BCBSMT or MCHA, they submitted claims that the insurers denied based upon exclusions contained in their insurance policies. These exclusions were subsequently disapproved by the Montana Commissioner of Insurance (Commissioner) and the insureds sought the previously-denied benefits. Eventually, the matter evolved into a class action and three of the claimants, Krista…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. McCulley v. U.S. BankMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Pallister v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API