Klesla v. Wittenberg
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Appellants Rostislav Klesla and Kristy-na Kleslova (the Kleslas) appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion for judgment on an arbitrator’s award. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In 2011, the Kleslas entered into a lease agreement (the lease) to rent Ron Wit-tenberg’s residential property in Scottsdale for an initial nine-month lease period. After an initial rent payment, the monthly rental payment was $5496 per month. Pursuant to the lease, the Kleslas put down a $10,990…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. JantzenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Holt v. BaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020