Legal Opinion

Daly v. Otis

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1928No. Docket No. 5909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to obtain a writ of mandamus commanding the defendants to draw a warrant in favor of the plaintiff in payment of an alleged pension. The defendant answered and a trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The trial court caused a judgment to be entered in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed. He has brought up what purports to be the judgment-roll, but it contains no findings.

The city of Alameda is governed under a freeholders’ charter. (Stats. 1917, p. 1752.) That charter created the office of city…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. CallahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Morris v. IdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turner v. LischnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Snyder v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Luxor Cab Co. v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Alcorn Ex Rel. Kirby v. Board of Fire CommissionersConnecticut Superior Court · 1942
  5. Snyder v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API