Legal Opinion
In re Azek Building Products, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 12-6627; MDL Docket No. 2506PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*612OPINION
ARLEO, District Judge.
This matter comes before this Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”) for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) [Dkt. No. 95]. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.
I. Facts
In this case, sixteen named plaintiffs seek to bring a class-action lawsuit under the laws of eleven states against Defendant AZEK Building Products, Inc. (“Defendant”). This dispute centers on alleged defects in Defendant’s decking products rising…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Schechner v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Peruto v. Timbertech Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Eberhart v. LG Electronics USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- ALTICE USA, INC. v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.