Legal Opinion

Bonaparte v. Fraternal Funeral Home

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdbN, J.

An undertaker, over the protest of the surviving wife, holds the dead body of the husband and thereafter embalms the same without the consent or approval of the wife, and upon demand of the wife, refuses to deliver the body until the fees are paid. Can such wife, upon such facts, recover punitive damages?

It was stated in the oral argument that the background of the case disclosed the business rivalry of competitive undertakers for posses sion of tbe body of the deceased. It was said of old that “Michael, the archangel, when contending with the devil, he disputed about the body of Moses,”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gadbury v. BleitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Kyles v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. In Re the Will of BealeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Floyd v. Atlantnc Coast Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Kirksey v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Worthy v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Goldman v. MollenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API