Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Beale

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

Did the court below commit error, in refusing the motion of propounder at the close of caveator’s evidence, for a directed verdict, on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to be submitted to the jury as to fraud or undue influence? We think not. Proceeding to probate writing as will is not inter partes, but is a proceeding in rem. In re Brown's Will, 194 N. C., 583.

The evidence was to the effect that D. E. Beale was the husband of Eva R. Beale. They lived in Greensboro, N. C., and had one child, Emma Irene Beale, now about 13 years of age. They had been married about 14 years. D. E.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Will of Amelia EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. In Re the Will of BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Grove v. SpikerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  4. In Re Will of HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Tucker v. WhiteheadMississippi Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. In Re the Purported Will of AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Hardee v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Scarborough v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Matter of Will of ColeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API