Barnes v. AT & T Pension Benefit Plannonbargained Program
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Re: Plaintiff Barnes’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses
In this action, plaintiff Quiller Barnes (“Barnes”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, alleges that defendant AT & T Pension Benefit Plan Nonbargained Program (“AT & T”) wrongfully denied him pension benefits to which he was entitled. Barnes’ amended complaint asserts three causes of action under the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act (“ERISA”) for: (1) failing to provide adequate notice of the reasons for benefit denial, 29 U.S.C. § 1133(1); (2)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Kohler v. Islands Restaurants, LPDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Lane v. PageDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Kohler v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Rosen v. Masterpiece Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.