Legal Opinion
Longhofer v. Hilbert
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided November 25, 1986No. Misc. No. 8600502PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*756OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF
2Per curiam
Petitioner was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer members of disobeying an order, dereliction of duty, and conduct unbecoming an officer. He was sentenced to confinement for two years, forfeiture of $1,000.00 pay per month for two years, and to be reprimanded. He requests extraordinary review of the convening authority’s decision not to grant his request for deferment of his sentence to confinement pending appeal of his conviction.
Two days after petitioner’s conviction, the convening authority deferred…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. SloanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. LonghoferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- Moore v. AkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- Hall v. ThwingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.