Legal Opinion

Poole Engineering & Machine Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1922No. 331-APublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbelu, Chief Justice

The plaintiff, as appears from the petition, had a contract with the United States to manufacture nine 12-inch barbette gun carriages, in accordance with certain drawings and specifications, for which it was to be paid $49,000 each. Deliveries were to begin on or before January 3,1918, and be completed as to all of the nine carriages by or be*233fore July 3, 1918. The contract was dated January 3, 1917. It was agreed that the Ordnanee Department would furnish the steel castings required by the work, beginning on or before April 3, 1917, and completing same on or before October 3, 1917. It is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Wells Brothers Co. of NY v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Francis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kehm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Ericksen v. Edmonds School District No. 15Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Dubois Const. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Tri-O, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. McQuagge v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API