Legal Opinion

Francis v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1878No. 556PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from tbe Court of Claims. This suit was. brought by Charles Francis, for the use of Nathan Myrick, to recover damages on account of extra expenses incurred in thé performance of a contract entered into, May 8, 1869, between Francis and the chief quartermaster of the military department of Dakota, for the delivery by the-.'former, on or before Jah.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe Court of Claims. This suit was. brought by Charles Francis, for the use of Nathan Myrick, to recover damages on account of extra expenses incurred in thé performance of a contract entered into, May 8, 1869, between Francis and the chief quartermaster of the military department of Dakota, for the delivery by the-.'former, on or before Jah. T5, 1870, of a number of cords of wood at certain military,posts; among others, at Fort Ransom, Dakota Territory, one, thousand cords. ’ The contract “stipulated and agreed that no traders, sutlers, contractors, civilians, or others should be…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

Post commanders in the military department where the present controversy arose were ordered to assume control of all timber, wood, hay, and grazing upon the public lands adjacent. to their respective posts, to the extent that the same were there required for the public use.

Supplies for the post were usually obtained by contract; and ■ it appears that a contract was made between the petitioner and the quartermaster of the department, by which the former agreed- to deliver and pile, in the wood-yard of the post, one thousand cords, more or less, of good, sound, merchantable oakAvood, to be…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Government National Mortgage Corp. v. Adana Mortgage Bankers, Inc. (In Re Adana Mortgage Bankers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  2. Commodity Credit Corporation v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co., Inc., a Corporation, Rosenberg Bros. & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. St. L., B. & M. Ry. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Tri-O, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API