Legal Opinion

Tri-O, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 26, 1993No. 92-194CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This contract matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff seeks damages, plus interest and attorney fees, resulting from a setoff by the defendant of amounts otherwise due plaintiff on a subsequent, unrelated contract. An oral hearing on the matter was held on April 13, 1993 in the National Courts Building in Washington, D.C. For reasons discussed herein, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, the defendant’s cross-motion is granted, and plaintiff’s complaint is to be dismissed.

Facts

On May 1, 1984, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  4. Thanet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Brock & Blevins Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. McLain Plumbing & Electrical Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Lamirage, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. W & F Building Maintenance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API