Legal Opinion

Cordero v. Panama Canal Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 21, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKS, District Judge.

The issue presented on this motion is whether the Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 751 et seq. 1 affords the sole and exclusive remedy to plaintiff against his employer the defendant, Panama Canal Company, for injuries sustained in the course of his employment as a member of the crew of the S. S. Ancon, a vessel owned and operated by it. The defendant’s argument in the main is that it is an agency or instrumentality of the United States and as such enjoys sovereign immunity except to the extent waived by the F.E.C.A.

The relevant section of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. StrangSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Panama R. Co. v. MinnixCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seven-Up Company v. O-So Grape Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1959
  2. John William Mills v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Haraburda v. United States Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1960
  4. C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API