Legal Opinion

Haraburda v. United States Steel Corporation

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 4, 1960No. Civ. A. 3578PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARR, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, a citizen of Michigan residing in Kent county, began this action-in the circuit court of Kent county on. November 26, 1958, against the defendant, a New Jersey corporation authorized, to do business in Michigan, to recover-damages resulting from personal injuries. On January 2, 1959, the defendant removed the action to this court on-the basis of diversity of citizenship, 28-U.S.C. § 1441(a).

In his declaration filed in circuit court: plaintiff alleged that his employer, the American News Company, Inc., had: leased an electric wire-tying machine- ffrom the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helen S. Cardwell, Administratrix of the Estate of Winfred M. Cardwell, Deceased v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Kraus v. Board Of County Road Commissioners For The County Of KentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. City of Burbank v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Kraus v. Board of County Road CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  5. Barrett v. BurtDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API