Legal Opinion

People v. Kass

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided June 12, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

It is evident from the contents of this coram nobis motion that defendant intends it to be the means for reviving a point raised, among others, in a prior motion, dated May 18, 1959. That motion was subsequently withdrawn in toto by letter, dated July 6, 1959, in which defendant titled it as, “A formal motion to withdraw.”

The point that defendant repeats here is that he had never been arraigned on Indictment No. 2782-51, to which he had put in the attainder by confession on a compromise.

Actual representation by counsel is not called in question.

Assuming that defendant’s displeasure is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SadnessNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. People v. KendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. People v. . TowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. People v. TowerNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. GencarelliNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. People v. MacchiHudson City Court · 1964
  4. People v. KassNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People ex rel. Bofill v. McMannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API