Legal Opinion

People v. Gencarelli

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided December 18, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

At this hearing as the sequence to the motion for eoram nobis relief, only one of the several original grounds was urged as a challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction on a plea of guilty, to wit: the removal of an indictment alleging a date in the future for the commission of the crime and the substitution of another, now in issue, alleging a date in the past. Fraud or misrepresentation is not involved as a subject of inquiry.

At this stage, it should be observed that the charge was defendant’s burden to prove by a preponderance of evidence. (People v. Cooper, 307 N. Y. 253;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. People v. OddoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. People v. HasenstabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. People v. EastmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. People v. CanforaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. BrimNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
  2. People v. KassNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962
  3. Hedgecock v. Oneida County Court, New York County Courts1959
  4. People v. WoodruffNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961
  5. People v. PassanteNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API