Legal Opinion

In re People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant’s contention that he was not arraigned on the indictment to which he pleaded guilty is contrary to at least some of the inferences to be drawn from the admittedly inconsistent records; but it has been held that a failure to arraign does not tend to prejudice the rights of a defendant who pleads guilty or proceeds to trial. (People v. Kass, 35 Misc 2d 449, 450 [resettlement den. 36 Misc 2d 1], affd. 18 A D 2d 796.) As to the second ground of appellant’s application, the acceptance of his plea of guilty, through his attorney, in open court, would not constitute grounds for reversal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SadnessNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. People v. KassNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962
  3. People v. KassNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HallenbeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People ex rel. Greene v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. CiccarelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. Willis, New York County Courts1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API