Legal Opinion

State v. Chong Hung Han

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2013No. SCWC-11-0000814PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that under Tachibana v. State, 79 Hawai'i 226, 900 P.2d 1293 (1995) and State v. Lewis, 94 Hawai'i 292, 12 P.3d 1233 (2000), a colloquy between the judge and a defendant involves a verbal exchange in which the judge ascertains the defendant’s understanding of the defendant’s rights. In this ease, the advisement by the Family Court of the First Circuit (the court) did not adequately ascertain whether Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Chong Hung Han (Petitioner) understood his Constitutional right to testify or not to testify. Further, Petitioner’s need for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Tachibana v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. MerinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. United States v. David CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Gomez-Lobato.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Monteil.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Pomroy.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Eduwensuyi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. Armitage.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API