Legal Opinion
State v. Phelps
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 18, 2003No. COA02-149PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
Defendant, Dwight Raymond Phelps, presents two issues on appeal arising from his conviction of felony possession of cocaine: (I) Did the trial court commit reversible error in denying defendant’s motion to suppress a statement made to the police because defendant’s constitutional right against self-incrimination as protected by Miranda v. Arizona was violated; and (II) Did the trial court commit reversible error in denying defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence obtained as a result of a coerced statement? We find no prejudicial error in defendant’s trial.
On 5 February…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CrookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- In Re LiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In re L.I.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. PigfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.