State v. Goodman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant pled guilty to first degree murder, but appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence obtained as the result of an interrogation that arguably violated his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966) and Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 68 L. Ed. 2d 378, 101 S. Ct. 1880 (1981). Because we are bound by State v. May, 334 N.C. 609, 611-12, 434 S.E.2d 180, 181 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1198, 127 L. Ed. 2d 661, 114 S. Ct. 1310 (1994), we affirm.
Factual Background
At 9:30 p.m. on 9 April 1999,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CrookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- In re H.V.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- In Re HVCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- in the Matter of H v., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
- in the Matter of H v., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005