State v. Crook
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ELMORE, Judge.
*785 Christopher Michael Crook (defendant) appeals from his two consecutive sentences of thirteen to twenty-five months imprisonment, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress a statement he made prior to receiving Miranda warnings, erred in sentencing him as a prior record level II offender, and committed plain error in its jury instructions. We reverse in part, find no error in part, and vacate and remand for resentencing.
I. Background
The State's evidence tended to show the following: On 14 June 2013, Detective Daniel Barale with the Fletcher Police…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Wilson-AngelesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. WidmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.