Legal Opinion
People v. Scott
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 2005No. 04CA2207PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHawthorne, J.
Defendant, Lorin D. Scott, appeals the trial court’s order denying his Crim. P. 35(a) motion. We affirm.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of vehicular eluding, a class five felony, in exchange for the dismissal of another charge against him. There were no sentencing concessions. The trial court sentenced him to five years in the Department of Corrections. Defendant did not appeal the conviction or the sentence.
*99Approximately two months later, defendant filed a Crim. P. 35(a) motion seeking to correct an illegal sentence.. He argued that the trial court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HochhalterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. HochhalterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- People v. BlindermanColorado Court of Appeals · 2006