Legal Opinion

People v. Blinderman

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 2006No. 04CA2536Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoy, J.

Defendant, David J. Blinderman, appeals the trial court’s order denying his Crim. P. 35(a) motion seeking postconviction relief. We affirm.

Pursuant to a plea agreement in which other charges were dismissed, defendant pleaded guilty to a single count of attempted unlawful distribution of a schedule II controlled substance in violation of §§ 18-2-101, 18-18-405(1), (2)(a)(I)(A), C.R.S.2005. As part of the agreement, the parties stipulated that defendant’s sentence would be subject to a cap of eight years in the custody of the Department of Corrections (DOC).

Defendant signed a written plea…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. EppensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. HuberSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. IsaacksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API