Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Hoffman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2003No. Nos. 20030141, 20030142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] This is a disciplinary action against Randall L. Hoffman. Hoffman petitioned this Court for review of a hearing panel’s report, which found he violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.12(a), 3.4(d), 4.2, and 4.4. The hearing panel also considered aggravating factors under North Dakota Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions. The hearing panel recommended Hoffman be suspended from the practice of law for one year and pay costs of $4,558.71. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Hoffman violated those rules, and we adopt the hearing panel’s recommendations.

[¶ 2] Hoffman was admitted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. Cho v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LucasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Application for Disciplinary Action Against HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LucasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. FaleideNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API