Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Lucas
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 2010No. 20100104PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] A hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board recommends Attorney A. William Lucas be publicly reprimanded and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding in the amount of $2,240.92 for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 4.2, communicating with a represented party. Counsel for the Disciplinary Board objects to the hearing panel’s recommended sanction. Lucas contends the evidence does not support a conclusion that he violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 4.2. Clear and convincing evidence establishes Lucas violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 4.2, and we direct Lucas be suspended from the practice of law for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- In Re Discipline of SchaeferNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CameronOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. HiattWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Judicial Conduct Commission v. HagarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LucasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Hodge - (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.