Legal Opinion
Vera State Bank v. Young
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 30, 1930No. 19813PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, C.
The positions of the parties in the trial court are reversed in this court. They will be referred to, respectively, as plaintiffs and defendant, as they appeared below.
On March 18, 1927, plaintiffs, by proper petition, brought a replevin action against defendants for certain machinery, to wit, one lightning combination hay press No. 0337 with Stover engine, of the value of $250, two 6-foot Deering hay mowers of the value of $50, and one sulkey rake and one sweep rake of the value of $50. Plaintiffs, in addition, demanded $100 damages for the detention of said property. The answer,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Moore v. Leigh-Head & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Byers v. IngrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Claremore v. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Longest v. LangfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pease v. GolightlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Neu v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Crown Drug Company v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Filtsch v. SipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946