Pease v. Golightly
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The plaintiff by replevin sought to recover possession of certain live stock, fowls, and farming tools and equipment. The plaintiff owned the property and had previously delivered it to the defendant pursuant to the terms of a contract or agreement by which defendant, as plaintiff’s tenant, was to have and use the property and care for the same, and have as his own one-half of the increase in the live stock and fowls, in addition to his use of the work stock in the farming venture.
The defendant disputed plaintiff’s right to possession, and sought damages for the wrongful taking of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Boyce v. Augusta Camp No. 7429, M. W. A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. DunnamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Kansas City Hay Press Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Little v. BlissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First National Bank of Amarillo v. LaJoieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- In Re Wilkins' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Edmonston v. HolderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Hales-Mullaly, Inc. v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Enid Bank & Trust Co. v. NollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.