Byers v. Ingraham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Mayes County; O. H. Graves, Judge. . ' Action by Hugh Ingraham against S. A. Byers. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
The appeal in this case is from the judgment of the trial court rendered upon the verdict of a jury in an action of replevin, involving the ownership and right to possession of one brown mule, of the value of $150. The plaintiff below claimed to own the mule and to be entitled to his immediate possession; that it had been wrongfully seized and sold under execution, although it was exempt from execution sale under the law. The defendant below claimed title and the right of possession by reason of purchase at an execution sale had upon an execution issued upon a judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chandler v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Brunson v. MerrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Burchett v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Claremore v. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Rich v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Chicago, R.I. P. R. Co. v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Harwell v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.