Tallman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*594DEL SOLE, Judge:
Today we are asked to determine whether a provision in an automobile insurance policy which prohibits the stacking of underinsurance coverage where multiple vehicles are insured under the policy should be declared invalid as contrary to the public policy expressed in the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701 et seq. We affirm the trial court’s ruling which determined that such a provision is void as violative of public policy.
The instant action was commenced by Appellee, administrator of the estate of his deceased wife, following a two car automobile…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Lambert v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.