Legal Opinion

Francis T. Zappone Co. v. Mark

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 27, 1985No. 12337PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.

The defendant Howard T. Brennan, having been found jointly liable with the defendant Sara Kramer to the plaintiff in the amount of $30,000 pursuant to a promissory note between the parties, has appealed to this court. On appeal he claims that the court erred in concluding that: (1) the promissory note, executed to secure a real estate commission, was enforceable without the written listing agreement being produced at trial; (2) the mere execution of a bond for deed without transfer of title entitled the plaintiff to a real estate commission; and (3) the plaintiff produced an able buyer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Bowne v. IdeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Meagher v. ReeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Cooper v. PolayesConnecticut Superior Court · 1955
  5. Society for Savings v. BraggConnecticut Superior Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Miller v. GuimaraesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Stern v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Solomon v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API