Legal Opinion

Society for Savings v. Bragg

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 16, 1981No. File 181825PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The present action has been brought by the plaintiff, Society for Savings, to foreclose a real property mortgage. The parties have stipulated to the following facts: The plaintiff is a mutual savings bank, chartered under a special act. On January 11, 1978, the defendant Bragg was indebted to the plaintiff, as evidenced by his promissory note for $650,000. To secure this note, Bragg executed a first mortgage deed to the plaintiff on a twenty-seven acre parcel of land located in the town of Cheshire. The said parcel, known as Highland Manor Apartments, was improved with fifty-six apartments.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Francis T. Zappone Co. v. MarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Glenwood Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Town of Irvington v. 1125-1127 Clinton Avenue AssociatesNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API