United States v. King
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*393Opinion of the Court
HomeR Ferguson, Judge:
We granted review in this case, limiting briefs and arguments to the following issue:
“Whether the pretrial advice (Article 34) and the post-trial review (Article 61) by the ‘Assistant Legal Officer’ is authorized under the Code.”
In view of the limited scope of the issue granted, it is unnecessary to set forth the facts developed at trial. It is sufficient to note that the accused was convicted by general court-martial of several offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and sentenced to a punitive discharge, total forfeitures, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. SelfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. CallahanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. DobsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. MillerU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United StateS v. WareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978