Legal Opinion

United States v. King

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 8, 1957No. 9762PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*393Opinion of the Court

HomeR Ferguson, Judge:

We granted review in this case, limiting briefs and arguments to the following issue:

“Whether the pretrial advice (Article 34) and the post-trial review (Article 61) by the ‘Assistant Legal Officer’ is authorized under the Code.”

In view of the limited scope of the issue granted, it is unnecessary to set forth the facts developed at trial. It is sufficient to note that the accused was convicted by general court-martial of several offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and sentenced to a punitive discharge, total forfeitures, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. SelfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CallahanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. DobsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. MillerU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United StateS v. WareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API