Legal Opinion

Marietta Page v. Telford Work

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1961No. 16787Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

An opinion was filed herein on March 8, 1961, affirming the judgment of the district court dismissing for want of federal jurisdiction a civil antitrust action.

On petition for rehearing, appellant asserts that we erred in our characterization of the procedural issues on appeal and in respect to the application of the rules of law stated in our opinion. We have reread the voluminous record in this case and concede that we may have been in error in holding that appellant, in effect, consented to a separate trial before the court on the separated issue of jurisdiction.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Walling v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Lindsey v. LeavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Amaya v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Amaya v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API