Legal Opinion

Amaya v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 4, 1945No. Civil Action 236PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

HANNAY, District Judge.

This law suit is brought by the plaintiffs, who allege that they are resident citizens of the Republic of Mexico, to recover title to property located in the south half of Section 44 of the Paul Subdivision of the Robert Driscoll Ranch, in Nueces County, Texas. The land in question lies between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande and was, until at least 1836, in the Mexican department, or state, of Tamaulipas. For cause of action plaintiffs rely on land grants issued by the Spanish Government in 1806, through which they claim as heirs of one Pedro Ygnacio Garcia, who,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Waite.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. McCormick v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McGlinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amaya v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. New Mexico Gamefowl Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Gonzales v. Yturria Land & Livestock Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1947
  4. Baeszler v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  5. Marietta Page v. Telford WorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API