Legal Opinion

Amaya v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1946No. 11751PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

The Plaintiffs, citizens of Mexico, claiming an interest in oil lands under a grant from the kingdom of Spain, and a right to recover for their portion of the minerals taken from the lands, have appealed from an adverse decree.

The lands lie between the Nueces and Rio Grande rivers in Texas. The original grantee from the kingdom of Spain conveyed the lands in 1811 to Pedro Ygnacio Garcia, a remote ancestor of the Plaintiffs, and likewise a citizen and resident of Mexico.

The Plaintiffs contend that the land between the Nueces and Rio Grande rivers was never under the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. McCormick v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  5. Geofroy v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Safety National Casualty Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Hidalgo County Water Control and Improvement District No. 7 v. Wyatt C. HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. First Investment Corp. of Marshall Islands v. Fujian Mawei ShipbuildingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. Aerovias Interamericanas De Panama, S.A. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1961
  5. Block v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API