Legal Opinion
United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1934No. 7552PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This caso has boon tried and appealed twice. Both trials resulted in verdicts for the defendant. The controversy concerns the movement of a certain switching engine and cars by servants of the appellee within the area known as and designated in the exhibits as “Seattle House Yard,” an industrial district in the southern part of the city of Seattle. The evidence shows that at 8 a. m. on January .19, 1932, appellee’s switch engine, operated by a switching crew, started from one of the tracks adjacent to the Great Northern freight house, located in the northerly portion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. South Buffalo R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1948
- United States v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.