United States v. Southern Pac. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
This action was brought to recover penalties for violations of the Federal-Safety Appliance Acts (45 USCA §§ 1-10). There were five counts in the complaint, each charging that the defendant railroad company had moved a train without making the use of power brakes capable of being operated by the engineer of the locomotive attached thereto. The District Court held that the several movements constituted switching operations within the terminal yards of the defendant; hence there was no violation of the act. The United States has appealed from the judgment.
The several…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.