Legal Opinion

United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1958No. 7534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding under § 6 of the Safety Appliance Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 6) to collect the statutory penalties for violations of the Act. The violations are said to have occurred when, on four occasions, the railroad moved cars without coupling their brakes so that they could be operated by the engineer. It is admitted that, in each instance, the only operable brakes were those upon the engine, so the only issue is whether or not the movements were train movements *264within the contemplation of the Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 9) and the supplementary orders of the Commission.

In…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. Carbon County Railway Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1961
  3. United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API