Legal Opinion

United States v. Pennsylvania R.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 7, 1948No. Civil Action No. 3862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Judge.

This is a complaint brought by the Government under Section 9 of the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-16, which provides, in relation to the number of cars to be operated with power or train brakes, as follows: “Whenever, as provided in this chapter, any train is operated with power or train brakes not less than 50 per centum of the cars in such train shall have their brakes used and operated by the engineer of the locomotive drawing .such train; and all power-braked cars in such train which are associated together with said 50 per centum shall have their brakes so…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
  4. New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API