Legal Opinion
Barnet v. Wied
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 18, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5833PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined by the four counts in issue to ap-pellee Carl A. Wied.
The interference is between appellee’s application No. 761,644, filed July 17, 1947, and appellant’s application No. 767,151, filed August 7, 1947. Thus appellant is the junior party.
The invention relates to a device for cleaning or stripping garnetting machines. Counts 1 to 3 are drawn to an apparatus, whereas count 4 is a method claim.
Count 1, which is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooper v. HubbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Gallagher v. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1903
- Curtis v. LandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- De Forest v. OwensCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Shumaker v. PaulsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Linkow v. LinkowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- American Sign and Indicator Corp. v. SchulenburgDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
- Heath v. ZenkichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Herrmann v. OtkenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Cusano v. DecepoliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954