Legal Opinion
Gallagher v. Hastings
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 20, 1903No. 215PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Hearing oil an. appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
This is an interference case involving the invention denned in the several counts of the following issue:
*90“ 1. A body-bolster for railway-cars formed with elevated outer and middle portions and depressed intermediate portions, substantially as set forth.
“ 2. A body-bolster for railway-cars formed with elevated outer and middle portions, and depressed intermediate portions having grooves to receive the sills of the car-body, substantially as set forth.
“ 3. A body-bolster for railway-cars formed with elevated outer and middle portions adapted to bear against the floor of the car-body depressed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. James J. YoungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Barnet v. WiedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Herrmann v. OtkenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Harry v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.