Legal Opinion
De Forest v. Owens
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 27, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2748PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
This is an interference ease, appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of She United States Patent Office. The Board affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, awarding priority of invention to appellee. ' The invention is expressed, and sufficiently described, for the purposes of this interference, in the following copnt:
“A printing machine for printing positives from negatives having sound and motion picture records displaced thereon, comprising means for printing the sound record from the negative onto the positive, and instrumentalities…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Standard Cartridge Co. v. Peters Cartridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Larson v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- Laughlin v. BurryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Fritz v. HawnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Myers v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Milford A. Campbell, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Spectrum Automation Company, Defendant-Counter-PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Barnet v. WiedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Riehm v. HambletonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943