Legal Opinion

Union Pac. R. v. Blair

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1916No. 2715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. D. Call, Judge. Action by the Union Pacific Railroad Company against Preston A. Blair and others, in which the J. S. Campbell Company intervened. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, a corporation, commenced this action in equity against Preston A. Blair, Lars Hansen, J. P. Blair, Simon S. Jensen, Stephen S. Blair, and Seth M. Blair, as stockholders of the Blair-Hansen Live Stock Company, a corporation, and also against said corporation. The plaintiff, hereinafter called appellant, sued the individual defendants named above, whom we shall call respondents, to recover an alleged balance due upon their stock subscriptions as stockholders of said Blair-Hansen Live Stock Company, hereinafter called company. Appellant, in its complaint, in substance, alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Reno Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Richardson v. Treasure Hill Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bissit v. Kentucky River Navigation Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1882
  4. Rolapp v. Ogden & Northwestern RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Thompson v. Reno Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richards v. District Court of Weber CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Tintic Indian Chief Min. & Mill. Co. v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ipswich Printing Co. v. EnglerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API