Legal Opinion

Bissit v. Kentucky River Navigation Co.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBaxter, J.

The act of March 1, 1865, entitled “An act to incorporate the Kentucky Biver Navigation Company,” under which the defendant corporation organized, authorized the county courts of the several counties bordering upon or interested in the navigation of said river to subscribe for and in behalf of their respective counties to the capital stock of said company, and levy and collect a tax to pay the same. County subscriptions were accordingly made to the amount of $775,000. These were supplemented by a subscription of $150,000 by the city of Louisville, $100,000 by Bissit & McMahon, and $2,-300 by…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Davenport v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Brewer v. Proprietors of the Boston TheatreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Miller v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Hale v. HardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
  3. Saylor v. Commonwealth Banking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Robinson v. PhegleyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Gund v. BallardNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API