Legal Opinion

Tintic Indian Chief Min. & Mill. Co. v. Clyde

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1932No. 5258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, District Judge.

In another and earlier cause between the Utah Standard Mining Company, a corporation, plaintiff in the former action, and the Tintic Indian Chief Mining & Milling Company, defendant in the former action, and plaintiff in this action, a judgment in favor of the defendant in that action was rendered for costs. The purpose of this action is to require the subscribers of stock in and incorporators of the Utah Standard Mining Company to pay that judgment because of a claimed stock subscription liability attaching to them as such stockholders, claiming that payment had not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Richardson v. Treasure Hill Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Rolapp v. Ogden & Northwestern RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Salt Lake Hardware Co. v. Tintic Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Henderson v. TurngrenUtah Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Bacon, State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shumaker v. UTEX EXPLORATION COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1957
  3. Shaw v. Bailey-McCune CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. East River Bottom Water Co. v. BoyceUtah Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API