Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Michael Christopher and Frank Buchanan appeal the judgment of the district court that they are not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Plaintiffs were employed as Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives (PSRs) for Defendant-Appellee SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (Glaxo). Glaxo classified Plaintiffs as “outside salesmen” — a legal designation that exempts an employee from the FLSA’s overtime-pay requirement. Plaintiffs’ suit challenges Glaxo’s classification…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Roger Smith v. Aegon Companies Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Mullins v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Exelon Generation Co. v. Local 15, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.